Dated public-records research · Clear explanations · Sources you can check

Dated research · Published 2026-09-25

Understand the surveillance technology in your community.

Automated license plate recognition (ALPR) is the first focus: read dated payment, decision, procurement, meeting and policy records, then see what each record can and cannot answer.

35 source-linked reports

Dickinson County · Attributed departmental statement · Records through 2026-07-13

Sheriff identified K.I.N.D. as purchaser in Dickinson County camera discussion

Dickinson County's July 2026 minutes record Sheriff Aaron Rochon saying that the K.I.N.D. executive board purchased the cameras and held installation authority. An earlier Iron Mountain record attributes a two-camera county count to a council member.

Helena Township · Purchase decision · Records through 2026-08-13

Helena Township's recorded $3,000 camera purchase vote

Posted October 2025 minutes record five affirmative votes to purchase a Flock camera for $3,000. August 2026 draft minutes record a later sheriff's-department discussion, with the draft status and attribution preserved.

Traverse City · Procurement and approved authorization · Records through 2022-12-19

Traverse City’s 2022 parking procurement: bids, recommendation and approved authorization

The 2022 parking trail includes an earlier approximately $260,000 DDA recommendation, a later $330,000 ceiling with contingent components, and an approved City Commission authorization. The retained records do not establish the executed agreement, spending, completed installation or police-network access.

Alpena County · Proposal; conflicting signed minutes · Records through 2026-03-24

Alpena County’s March 2026 camera request and conflicting signed minutes

A Sheriff’s Office request proposed grant-funded Flock costs. Both draft minutes and the county’s signed archive copy preserve a failed purchase motion followed by a contradictory approval recommendation; the eventual purchase outcome remains unresolved.

Wisconsin State Patrol · Written policy · Records through 2025-03-07

Reading Wisconsin State Patrol's March 2025 ALPR policy

Wisconsin State Patrol policy 4-3 sets written requirements for alert confirmation, historical access, sharing, documentation and custom-hotlist audits. The document does not establish observed compliance or rules for every Wisconsin agency.

Forest Home Township · Camera financing vote · Records through 2026-08-06

Forest Home recorded a 3–2 vote to finance one Flock camera

Forest Home Township’s July 2, 2026 minutes record a motion approving the Antrim County Sheriff’s Department request to finance one Flock camera within the township. Steiner, Mahan and Smith voted aye; Kent and Crandall voted nay. The township’s linked August minutes record approval of the July 2 minutes.

Garfield Township · Agreement authorization · Records through 2023-03-28

Garfield minutes record authorization for a Flock agreement and data-sharing MOU

Garfield Township’s March 28, 2023 handouts include March 14 minutes recording five affirmative votes and no negative votes to enter an agreement with Flock Group, authorize the supervisor to sign, and enter a memorandum with the Grand Traverse County Sheriff’s Department concerning data generated by the system.

Peninsula Township · Renewal motion · Records through 2024-08-13

Peninsula Township recorded a twelve-month Flock renewal

Peninsula Township’s August 13, 2024 minutes record a unanimous roll-call vote to renew the Flock Safety contract for twelve months. The preceding discussion identifies six cameras and an $18,000 annual renewal quote. Those figures describe the meeting’s renewal discussion; they do not establish money paid or the contract’s present status.

Waukesha · Donation and contract approval · Records through 2026-09-15

Waukesha approved more Flock cameras in 2025, then voted to remove planned Flock funding in 2026

On September 15, 2026, Waukesha’s council voted 13–0, with two members absent, to remove $292,000 for the Flock program from its 2027–2031 capital plan. The executive capital budget listed $56,000 for 2027 and 2028, calling 2027 year 4 of a five-year Flock contract, plus 2029–2031 estimates in case of a new contract. A year earlier, the council approved a three-camera contract addition by consent. The 2026 vote appears in the city’s Legistar database; the city’s meeting page marked the minutes as not yet final when reviewed.

Racine · Contract continuation and camera-covering vote · Records through 2026-09-15

Racine rejected a Flock termination amendment and voted to bag the cameras within 30 days

Racine’s final September 15, 2026 council minutes record three votes on the Flock camera contract. A motion to terminate it within a 30-day grace period, with police retaining information, failed 6–8. A motion to bag the cameras within 30 days and allow the use of data for ongoing investigations passed 8–7, with Mayor Mason among the ayes. The council then approved the communication as amended, 8–6. The resolution text presented for the meeting would have kept the contract in effect through December 31, 2026; the retained records do not show how the amendment changed that text.

Oconomowoc · Cancellation resolution in council packet · Records through 2026-09-15

Oconomowoc’s council adopted a resolution to cancel its six-camera Flock contract

Oconomowoc’s posted minutes for the September 15, 2026 Common Council meeting record that a motion to adopt Resolution 26-R3404, cancelling the city’s contract with Flock Safety, carried; the minutes give the vote as “5-0-2” and list two aldermen as voting no. The city administrator’s memo in the meeting packet says the city has six cameras under a 2026–2027 extension, notes statements from other law enforcement agencies about Flock retaining data longer than agreed, and says the city may owe $18,000 in 2027 if the contract is canceled.

Milwaukee · Administrative use limits · Records through 2026-09-22

Milwaukee police say Flock queries are now supervisor-only, MPD stopped sharing its data and retention is seven days

Mayor Cavalier Johnson’s August 31, 2026 statement announced new limits on the Milwaukee Police Department’s Flock camera use. In a September 11, 2026 letter to Common Council members, the police chief wrote that only supervisors can query the plate-reader system and MPD no longer shares its data with other agencies, both effective September 1; that queries are limited to listed crime types and missing-person cases; and that data is kept seven days. The letter also says MPD supervisors can still use other agencies’ plate-reader feeds in 836 jurisdictions. These are administrative changes described by the mayor and the department; the revised operating procedure was still a draft, and no council-adopted rule is in the record.

Oshkosh · Renewal approval rescinded · Records through 2026-04-22

Oshkosh approved a one-year Flock renewal 5–2, then rescinded it 7–0 the next day

On April 21, 2026, Oshkosh’s Common Council amended Resolution 26-164 from a two-year to a one-year Flock renewal and approved it 5–2. At a special meeting on April 22, the council voted 7–0 for Resolution 26-196, which rescinds that approval and directs staff to reject the agreement and notify Flock Group Inc. that the city will not proceed. According to the minutes, the police chief said his staff had told him that information a Flock representative gave the council about whether the system can create a heat map of travel patterns was inaccurate.

Wisconsin Legislature · Bill texts and histories · Records through 2026-03-23

Wisconsin’s 2025–26 plate-reader bills failed to pass without a listed hearing or vote

Wisconsin legislators introduced plate-reader bills in 2025 that took different approaches. AB 576 would have banned plate-reader use, with exceptions, and required warrants for police access to plate-reader and private security-camera data. AB 300 would have funded purchases through state grants; a related Senate bill, SB 299, has the same relating clause. The histories and committee records list no hearing or vote, and they record each bill as failing to pass under the session schedule in March 2026.

Michigan Legislature · Pending bill texts and status · Records through 2026-07-29

Michigan’s 2026 plate-reader bills had no committee or floor action as of September 24, 2026

Michigan legislators introduced three bills in 2026 that would limit government use of automatic plate readers to listed purposes, require posted policies and quarterly reports, and restrict disclosure of plate data. The legislature’s status pages, retrieved September 24, 2026 (U.S. Central time), list no action on any of the bills after committee referral except electronic reproduction. The texts differ on retention. HB 5493 sets a 14-day limit with exceptions. SB 1131 as introduced states no day count: section 5(1) bars retention except for listed reasons, and each agency’s privacy policy sets a maximum time subject to that section.

Verona · Nonrenewal vote · Records through 2025-11-24

Verona records document a vote declining Flock renewal

Minutes from November 10, 2025, included in Verona’s November 24 council packet, record a 7–1 vote to decline renewal of the Flock Safety contract, with Weiss voting no. The city’s official meeting recap also reports the decision to decline renewal. These are decision records; they do not establish when cameras stopped operating or were removed.

Neenah · Camera recommendation approval · Records through 2022-02-16

Neenah minutes record approval of a $16,500 camera purchase

Neenah’s February 16, 2022 packet includes February 2 council proceedings and detailed minutes. Both record all members voting aye on the committee’s camera-purchase recommendation. The recommendation identifies $16,500 from the 2022 Capital Improvement Program and the Flock services agreement. This is a dated authorization, not evidence of complete spending or current operation.

Marinette · Committee recommendation · Records through 2026-08-17

Marinette committee recommended approval of a Flock contract

Minutes of Marinette’s December 16, 2024 Public Safety and Code Enforcement Committee meeting, reproduced in the January 20, 2025 packet, record concurrence in recommending that the Common Council approve the Flock contract. The minutes attribute a proposed shared cost with the county to Police Chief LaCombe. The recommendation does not establish the council’s later decision or an executed cost-sharing agreement.

Menomonie · Purchase approval and attributed later account · Records through 2024-06-03

Menomonie council approved a $57,900 Flock purchase with ARPA funds

February 2024 official proceedings record a purchase approval with one dissent. Later minutes record the police chief describing use of the cameras; neither source proves payment or current operation.

Berrien County · Approval records · Records through 2024-03-14

Berrien County's March 2024 license plate reader approval records

Berrien County records document approval of a five-year continuation for countywide license plate reader service with Flock Group Inc. The same-day Board minutes record 12 yeas and no nays on the consent calendar containing that contract.

Use the records-reading guide

Reading a public payment or approval record

A practical guide to identifying a record's issuer and date, separating a payment entry from a governing-body decision, and stating the limits of each document.

Why the collection stays focused

I’m building this as a one-person, bootstrapped project. A selective collection gives me room to trace claims to the relevant pages, explain open questions, and review corrections as capacity allows. The aim is useful regional access that grows only as the source-review work can be sustained.

Compare records from the Upper Peninsula, northern Lower Michigan and Wisconsin.

Begin with a public record you can check

Public availability is not the same as practical visibility. A meeting packet can be online and still be difficult to find, interpret, or connect to the question being discussed. Start with a report, follow its source link and locator, then share the public link with someone who can use it in local civic work.

The reports show traceable record trails across several document types without turning those records into claims about current deployment or complete regional coverage.

Support this work

Optional tips help keep this research free, source-linked, and available to everyone. Support this work.